Agree the input and control boundary
Identify invoices, purchase orders, receipts, approval thresholds and responsible reviewers.
Invoice, purchase-order and receipt data can disagree. LedgerSight brings the exception context and proposed next step to a reviewer, with evidence of the decision retained.
Identify invoices, purchase orders, receipts, approval thresholds and responsible reviewers.
Review the relevant line, amount, quantity or reference context. The proposed explanation remains separate from an approved action.
Record the reviewer, reason and any approved next step. Payment or posting is not performed autonomously by LedgerSight.
Keep the invoice, order and receipt context together so the reviewer can inspect the discrepancy.
Request the agreed supporting evidence rather than treating an incomplete source as confirmed.
Retain the reason for the flag and the person’s resolution without assuming the flag proves duplication.
Bring a description of the current process, the systems involved, the exception types you see and who approves resolutions. Start with sample or redacted inputs; do not send financial records through the website enquiry form.
Input formats, connected systems, approval routing and evidence export requirements are agreed during scoping. See the security review checklist before discussing deployment.
A useful record connects source context, the proposed resolution, the policy boundary, the human decision and the outcome. Read the fictional sample evidence record to understand the field shape.
Explore LedgerSight for the wider finance workflow or the accounting-firm pilot for a scoped starting point.
No. It supports review around the systems already in use. Compatibility and any approved-action handoff are confirmed during scoping.
LedgerSight does not post entries or make payments on its own. A reviewer sees the proposal and supporting context before an approved business action.