Bring the source context
Agree the bank statement and ledger inputs, reporting period, ownership and access. Supported formats are confirmed during scoping.
Timing differences, missing references, duplicates and unmatched entries need context before anyone decides a resolution. LedgerSight supports exception review alongside the finance systems already in use.
Agree the bank statement and ledger inputs, reporting period, ownership and access. Supported formats are confirmed during scoping.
Inspect the lines, amount, date and reference context. AI proposes a next step; a finance reviewer decides whether the explanation and evidence support it.
Apply the agreed review boundary before any business action. Retain what was proposed, who decided and the observed result.
Ask what additional context a reviewer needs before linking the receipt.
Keep the reporting period and source timestamps visible rather than forcing a match.
Review both source entries and the reason for the flag before deciding what to do.
Bring a description of the current process, the systems involved, the exception types you see and who approves resolutions. Start with sample or redacted inputs; do not send financial records through the website enquiry form.
Input formats, connected systems, approval routing and evidence export requirements are agreed during scoping. See the security review checklist before discussing deployment.
A useful record connects source context, the proposed resolution, the policy boundary, the human decision and the outcome. Read the fictional sample evidence record to understand the field shape.
Explore LedgerSight for the wider finance workflow or the accounting-firm pilot for a scoped starting point.
No. It supports review around the systems already in use. Compatibility and any approved-action handoff are confirmed during scoping.
LedgerSight does not post entries or make payments on its own. A reviewer sees the proposal and supporting context before an approved business action.